- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:35:40 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <53B3AD3A.8020307@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >The reason I ask is that people might start putting ":status" into a >trailer and expect that to have an effect (it would be nice to have that >feature, but it wouldn't map to 1.1...). It would also be pretty pointless: It would just shift the buffering responsibility from the server to the client. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 07:36:02 UTC