It is OK for me if an "explicit acknowledgement" (including proxies) mechanism for extensions is specified in the HTTP/2 spec. Otherwise, not. IIUC such mechanism is not specified, right? Is there any discussion? Thanks, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/537> > > On 1 Jul 2014, at 4:40 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 30 June 2014 11:23, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> That's an argument for the new application negotiation token. > >> > >> Such a proxy should only be put in a place where no negotiation is > necessary. Bailing out at any END_SEGMENT would be acceptable then. > > > > There's an obvious counterargument to that one... > > > > That's fine, but if you want to operate sans-standard, then you can > > add your own END_SEGMENT. > > > > I really don't care either way here. I'm just enumerating the > > options, and noting that what is currently specified isn't > > particularly well-supported. Our responsibility is to either more > > clearly define it, or remove it. > > Agreed. > > It sounds like we're leaning towards removing it - can people live with > that? > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 05:29:27 UTC