Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product

On 2014-03-28 18:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> The new draft looks great. However, I don't understand the syntax
> question. Why are the quotation marks not appropriate?

a) There's potential confusion with other header fields where double 
quotes indicate quoted-string escaping.

b) It adds overhead to the common case of simple protocol names.

c) It doesn't solve the problem that protocol names can contain octets 
not suitable for use in header fields.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 17:44:17 UTC