Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product

On 2014-03-25 22:29, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I think these are manageable concerns.
>
> I'm not hearing any pushback on adopting alt-svc, and as mentioned there's been a good level of support for it, so Julian, please fork draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-05 and create draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-00 in the http2-spec repository (I believe you already have access there).
>
> Source is here:
>    https://github.com/mnot/I-D/tree/master/httpbis-alt-svc
>
> I'll leave it up to you to figure out whether you want to use the markdown or XML as source. :)
>
> Martin, please consider the corresponding pull request as editor-ready and make adjustments / ask questions as you see fit.
>
> Cheers,
> ...

The draft has been transformed into a WG draft and submitted as -00; see 
the changes at 
<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-05&url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-00>.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 09:33:42 UTC