- From: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:09:54 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 27.03.2014 22:03, K.Morgan@iaea.org wrote: > On 26 March 2014 19:18, Roland Zinks wrote: >> I like the idea of requiring transfer encoding instead of content encoding but I have concerns regarding >> replacing content-encoding by transfer encoding... > Understood. > >> Mandating content-encoding gzip has the same issue as it is not mandated in HTTP/1.1 and a gateway >> can't really translate. > Not sure what you mean exactly. Isn't that how Section 9.3 of the current draft is written (i.e. content-encoding: gzip is explicitly supported on every request)? > Yes it is written this way and this is a problem for a gateway from my point of view.
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 09:10:16 UTC