- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:46:10 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, operator error; forgot to run make :-/ Please see: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-05 Cheers, On 21 Mar 2014, at 10:42 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > In London, we agreed to use the Alternative Services approach to satisfy issue #349 (Load Asymmetry). > > In subsequent discussion at the Design Team Meeting, it seemed like the most reasonable approach to doing this would be to publish the non-HTTP/2 specific parts in a separate draft, while keeping those parts specific to HTTP/2 in the main spec (in particular, the ALTSVC frame). > > I've just submitted draft -04 of Alternative Services: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-04 > under consultation with Martin and Patrick. > > In parallel, I've just made a pull request to add the HTTP/2-specific parts, with appropriate references: > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/439 > > As discussed, neither of these proposals contains language about HTTP:// over TLS or opportunistic encryption; that discussion is separate. > > Also as discussed, none of this places any requirement upon a recipient to do anything special for ALTSVC beyond not blowing up when it's encountered. > > Please have a look at these and raise any concerns you have. The plan is to convert the draft to a WG document, and Julian has graciously agreed to take over its editorship. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 21 March 2014 06:46:19 UTC