Re: Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 from Julian Reschke on 2014-03-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:04:13 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>, "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <532AA0FD.60106@gmx.de>

On 2014-03-20 08:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I don't think that's the case, Julian. Alt-Svc is used for many things; William has so far only expressed a reservation about one use case. Likewise, Rob's message was just about upgrade, not other uses of Alt-Svc.
>
> Cheers,
> ...

Rob said: "In particular, I do not want to see the Alt-Svc work further 
delaying HTTP/2." which IMHO implies that he think it's not strictly 
needed (otherwise the statement wouldn't make sense, right?).

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 20 March 2014 08:04:45 UTC