Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307

On 2014-01-16 21:43, Phil Hunt wrote:
> What is the objection to 308?

It's new. We can't put it into RFC2616bis due to our charter.

> If there is good reason not to use it, why not pick another code?

The spec is already approved and the status code is registered.

That being said, Chrome hasn't made any progress implementing it because 
it conflicts with an internal use of 308 in the Google Drive HTTP binding.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 20:48:42 UTC