- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:23:26 +0100
- To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
- CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-01-16 21:11, Phil Hunt wrote: > Both 301 and 302 say to use 307 if conversion to GET is not desired. > > With 307 used for both temporary and perm redirect, 307 loses meaning causing the confusion. > > Phil > ... Do you have a concrete change proposal that doesn't require putting 308 into the base spec? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 20:23:59 UTC