- From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:15:04 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "scim@ietf.org WG" <scim@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Thanks. I believe http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25 does cover the issue. Though Phil > On Jan 16, 2014, at 8:03, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 2014-01-16 17:00, Phil Hunt wrote: >> Thanks. 2616 should be changed. > > The point being that the definitions of the redirect codes have been rewritten a lot in HTTPbis. > > Optimally, there is no need to have an additional document *at all*. > >> ... > > Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 16:15:43 UTC