- From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:00:17 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "scim@ietf.org WG" <scim@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Thanks. 2616 should be changed. I am open to broadening applicability to all non-browser HTTP services. Phil > On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:50, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 2014-01-16 16:42, Phil Hunt wrote: >> Assuming you are refering to the 308 redirect draft. What is the current reference for 308? > > No, I'm referring to citing RFC 2616. > >> REST services need redirects that do not convert to GET. That would corrupt the operation. > > Yes. For some value of "Rest services"; I'd recommend to avoid that term altogether; just define an HTTP based service that makes sense and uses HTTP properly. > > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 16:00:56 UTC