Re: CRLF requirement

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> You are asking for a backwards-incompatible change on a spec that *just* was
> published.

I'm not sure why you think publishing has any merit. As long as the
running code is different, it's just a bug.


> Do you have any *evidence* that accepting single CRs is actually required?

Given that all major clients do it, I think the evidence should be
sought elsewhere.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 13:17:02 UTC