- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:50:37 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2014-06-30 13:40, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2014-06-30 13:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Assuming that the statement above is true: because there are some existing >> implementations that require CRLF and which would be broken by just sending >> CR or LF. > > It seems for robustness you'd want to parse using newline (per initial > email), but require CRLF for transmission. (The tight coupling the > HTTP specification has with parsing and format has always seemed like > a bug.) > ... Do you have any evidence that accepting anything but CRLF is needed in practice? If yes, we'd probably want to add something to the prose about the message format. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 11:51:13 UTC