- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:34:20 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2014-06-30 13:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Why does https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230 still require CRLF while > most implementations handle either CR or LF fine? As far as I can tell Assuming that the statement above is true: because there are some existing implementations that require CRLF and which would be broken by just sending CR or LF. This would be a non-backwards-compatible change. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 11:34:56 UTC