- From: Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:13:15 -0500
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> The same applies here. We're chartered to define a protocol that can > carry HTTP. We already have evidence that >16K of headers is > sometimes used. And that is enough reason to provide support. > Period. Which is fine, but why not support that oft cited questionable need through an extension as opposed to a seemingly largely reviled CONTINUATION mechanism? cheers, jesse
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 23:14:02 UTC