Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

On 26 June 2014 01:20, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> AIUI the offer is to replace that "infinite" with a fixed and negotiated
> large size.

That's not quite correct.  See my post here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014AprJun/1715.html

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 16:34:21 UTC