Re: HTTP/2 vs. proxies ?

Eric wrote:
> the only thing HTTP/2 is ready for is T-E,
which will only happen if, not when, the corporate interests jump on
the interoperability bandwagon. So I'm sure HTTP/2 will go to last
call without it, this is simply not the consensus view (although I
question whether this would be the case if HTTP/2 were being developed
by those who care about architecture over the corporate bottom line
for the next quarter).

Speaking of T-E, and non-corporate interests, I've cobbled together
something based on one of my original proposals for encoded/compressed
DATA frames, taking advantage of the new extensibility model:
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data/>

If there's interest I'm happy to hand it over to the wg, or to shuffle
the ids up into the experimental ranges and keep it unofficial.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

Received on Sunday, 22 June 2014 01:16:33 UTC