Re: intermediaries, implicit gzip, etags, no-transform

On 20 June 2014 14:08, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org> wrote:
>> We just (two weeks ago) killed implicit gzip in HTTP/2, so we're pretty
>> sure it's a serious problem.
>
>
> My recollection (and that of the meeting minutes) was that we killed
> implicit gzip because there are gnarly HTTP/1 spec conformance issues, and a
> similar outcome can be achieved if first-mover HTTP/2 deployments refuse
> HTTP/2 requests with a-e: identity. I don't recall it being substantiated as
> a "serious problem" in that conversation.

We killed it so that we could avoid having to talk about it any more.
That worked out well, didn't it?

Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 21:19:54 UTC