- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 23:14:17 +0200
- To: Michael Piatek <piatek@google.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-06-20 22:53, Michael Piatek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> In the meantime, can you define what you consider a "real" site? > > A site that breaks when using the data compression proxy that is not > contrived to do so. > >>>> - setting "cache-control: no-transform" on the response, does not change >>>> this behavior, thus both seem to violate a "MUST NOT" requirement from >>>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7230.html#rfc.section.5.7.2> > > Actually, an example URL would be helpful for this case as well. In my > testing, I observe the proxy respecting the no-transform directive; > i.e., response payloads carrying cache-control: no-transform are not > modified, nor are the protected headers. Is "Content-Encoding" in your set of "protected headers"? Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 21:14:57 UTC