Re: #445: Transfer-Codings

On 22 April 2014 18:44, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> I also don't hear any arguments that it's fundamentally harmful to include -- just that some aren't interested in implementing it for their use case. So, my inclination is to include it in the implementation draft, barring a new argument against it that is convincing.

I've included the changes [1].  Again with changes:

There are security considerations now.
There is a note about Content-Length.

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/commit/a02f5a868d99234cc19c7644ad38f91e151413fb

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 20:38:18 UTC