W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #445: Transfer-Codings

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:37:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUD=+bQG422n7+KhO5xFGR6B6RtbFNOHk09+KK6F8CBog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 22 April 2014 18:44, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> I also don't hear any arguments that it's fundamentally harmful to include -- just that some aren't interested in implementing it for their use case. So, my inclination is to include it in the implementation draft, barring a new argument against it that is convincing.

I've included the changes [1].  Again with changes:

There are security considerations now.
There is a note about Content-Length.

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/commit/a02f5a868d99234cc19c7644ad38f91e151413fb
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 20:38:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:26 UTC