W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Dealing with BLOCKED [#362]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:53:36 +1000
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <353104BC-583C-47A4-BE61-DB94B715BEB1@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thanks to everyone who replied.

It looks like there are a number of implementations who are interested in this, so let's include it in our next implementation draft.

Martin, please incorporate it, but mark the section(s) as AT RISK, and leave the issue open.

Cheers,


On 18 Apr 2014, at 4:37 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> There's been a lot of discussion of this issue, but (predictably) no more data.
> 
> As indicated earlier, I think the best way to decide about this proposal is to get some operational experience with it, and one way to do that is to include it in the next implementation draft with a note to the effect that it's an "at risk" feature -- i.e. we'll pull it in the next draft if we don't agree to keep it in NYC.
> 
> Please comment on this in the next ~3 days; if we don't hear convincing arguments as to why this is a bad idea, we'll follow that plan.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 07:54:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:26 UTC