Re: #445: Transfer-codings

On Apr 4, 2014 4:46 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3 April 2014 22:21, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Does that not count as an implementation detail?
>
> That's not the point.  The point is that an endpoint needs to be able
> to limit the state commitment it makes.  Based on this, the commitment
> could be as much as 256K for these settings.

Or as little as zero. Or, if they do support gzip, nothing stops them
interpreting any >0 rank as 1, and remembering 1 bit per thingy. I don't
understand what you're getting at.