- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:20:13 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 03/09/2013, at 5:40 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > But it seems we lost the description of that mechanism; in <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#warnings> I see: > > "HTTP/1.0 caches will cache all Warnings in responses, without deleting the ones in the first category. Warnings in responses that are passed to HTTP/1.0 caches carry an extra warning-date field, which prevents a future HTTP/1.1 recipient from believing an erroneously cached Warning." > > Maybe it would be good to re-add something like that because it explains what the date actually is for. Perhaps. Do you still have an issue with the proposed change? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 08:20:43 UTC