Re: initial stream id from a client from Martin Thomson on 2013-08-13 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:24:58 +0100
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV0U02P1_x--NXTLC-APMTOC=QBK8PkJGHunE+kcghrOA@mail.gmail.com>

On 13 August 2013 11:08, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> For simplicity and consistency I prefer that the stream #1 is always
> reserved, so that client always starts with stream 3.

This sounds like a reasonable motivation for option 3.  Does anyone
want to argue for using stream 1 when over TLS?

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:25:25 UTC