- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:49:01 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
FWIW, had a thread on this already on list... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JulSep/0624.html My POV: push streams ought to be limited strictly to GET or HEAD. Period. - James On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > There's been something of a long thread on github about this topic, > that Will was unsuccessful in moving over here. Let me try again. > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/193 > > Julian summarized the issue quite cogently as: >> [...] HTTP/1.1 allows safe methods with payload, so if we decide that >> in HTTP/2.0 we want to allow PUSH for safe methods, we shouldn't >> rule out that they could have payloads. > > I'm just going to throw out the obvious counter argument here, namely: > > HTTP/2.0 doesn't allow push for safe methods, it allows push for safe > methods that do not have request bodies. > > And then we see what happens. Commence! >
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 19:49:49 UTC