- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:03:15 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: [snip] >>> >>> Wrong. >>> >>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-11.html#updated.registry.contents> >>> >> >> Well... yes, there are the PROPFIND, SEARCH and REPORT methods which >> are both safe and idempotent... however, given that PUSH_PROMISE gives >> us no means of sending an implied payload along with the implied > > > Yes, that's what needs to get fixed. > I hear you but I disagree ;-) Perhaps there is a non-theoretical, somewhat-plausible use-case that cannot be addressed using GET/HEAD that I'm missing here? If not, lets draw a line in the sand with GET/HEAD and move on. - James >> ... > > > Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 21:04:02 UTC