Re: HTTP 2.0 in the clear and over TLS

That's great to hear. I wasn't aware that TLS wg was considering addressing
this.

Thanks!

Peter


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 30 July 2013 17:28, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote:
> > because TLS costs 1 additional round trip per domain at minimum
>
> This is an interesting point.  Perhaps you would be interested to
> learn that a) this is a known problem with a number of well-known
> solutions, and b) the TLS working group is talking about starting on
> TLS 1.3.  I'll let you draw your own conclusions about this.
>