- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:22:24 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 16/07/2013 10:20 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote: > On 15 July 2013 12:44, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote: >> I'm wondering why the text proscribes error handling of MUST ignore in >> response to violation of the MUST NOT send provision. > I think that someone either caught Postel's DIsease, or is in remission. > >> Can we either change it to PROTOCOL ERROR (preferred) or just be silent on >> handling of the error? > PROTOCOL_ERROR seems appropriate. > > Opened: > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/174 +1. And double that for more strictness everywhere. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 12:22:58 UTC