- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 07:08:03 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <20130712125628.GC28893@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >Not really in fact. While I tend to generally agree with the points >you make for scalability, this one does not scale. One of the big >benefits of cookies is that client is responsible for synchronizing >information between multiple servers *if needed*. Since when has a minor scalability issue for Big Companies become more important than end-users privacy ? Sorry, that argument simply does not fly with me. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 08:16:25 UTC