Re: Incorporating Layering TF work [was: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate, mk2]

Yes, please. It's not the end of the world if the -04 draft doesn't reference it specifically.

Regards,



On 05/07/2013, at 3:19 AM, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> wrote:

> There has been some updates to the Compression draft. Do we want to publish a new version at the same time, which would be referenced from the HTTP/2.0-04 draft?
> 
> Hervé.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
>> Sent: jeudi 4 juillet 2013 06:35
>> To: Martin Thomson
>> Cc: HTTP Working Group
>> Subject: Incorporating Layering TF work [was: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate, mk2]
>> 
>> Thanks, Martin.
>> 
>> We've already heard a number of people react positively to this draft, and it's
>> incorporated a substantial amount of feedback. As always, the discussion
>> about the organiation and the content of the draft will continue, but this
>> seems like a good moment to capitalise on all of the work that the layering TF
>> has done.
>> 
>> So, does anyone have an objection to adopting this as the basis of draft -04?
>> Unless I hear a good argument as to why we shouldn't very soon, I'm going to
>> instruct the editors to do so.
>> 
>> Note that implicitly, doing so will close the issues marked "Layering TF":
>>  https://github.com/http2/http2-
>> spec/issues?labels=Layering+TF&milestone=&page=1&state=open
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/07/2013, at 4:37 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> As requested:
>>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-unicorn-httpbis-http2-01
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 01:12:46 UTC