- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:55:42 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2 July 2013 12:51, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, there are cases where the mechanism spec'd in SPDY today is suboptimal. > That seems like a poor reason to reject it, however, when the alternative is > guaranteed suboptimality. That's true, the coalescing that SPDY does won't work 100% of the time, but the times where it does work will make (most) things better. If by better you mean fewer connections - and we're fairly sure that is actually better.
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 19:56:10 UTC