Re: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate

Thanks, this was a bit rushed in parts so I potentially botched a few
edits. Pull requests much appreciated, especially for the small stuff.
On Jul 1, 2013 9:30 PM, "Shigeki Ohtsu" <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> wrote:

> Thanks for your great work.
>
> I've just read through the draft and submited a PR for some editrial fixes
> againt a layering branch.
> https://github.com/http2/**http2-spec/pull/157<https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/157>
> Please review it. If the PR to the branch is not good for fix, pelase let
> me know it.
>
> Regards,
>
> (2013/07/02 9:23), Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> Those people who volunteered to contribute to the layering work in the
>> SF interim have come up with something.  This includes a restructuring
>> of the content.
>>
>> Since the changes are large in scope, we're not submitting this as
>> draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-04.  I've put this up as an individual
>> submission so that people can comment on structure, text, omissions:
>>
>>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-unicorn-httpbis-http2-00<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-unicorn-httpbis-http2-00>
>>
>> Note: This is a proposal for the content of the
>> draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-04.  Please let us know - as soon as possible
>> - if the idea of this becoming a -04 offends you somehow.
>>
>> This draft includes resolutions to all the issues on our milestone,
>> with the exception of two (#75: default priorities, #17: opaque data
>> in GOAWAY and RST_STREAM), which I plan to address tomorrow.
>>
>> Now, most of the final pass is my fault (with a little help from the
>> github unicorn), so blame me for all the bad stuff and praise Jeff and
>> James for providing all the good stuff.
>>
>>
>
>