W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1

From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:19 +0000
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <em94119d23-43b0-4de4-a3e3-8c30e8a40bfc@bombed>


------ Original Message ------
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>; "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" 
<ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 19/03/2013 12:17:38 a.m.
Subject: Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
>In message <ema8b6f777-7b08-4723-b705-f55ab8fa61af@bombed>, "Adrien W. 
>de Croy" writes:
>
>>for instance a cache receiving a request with If-Modified-Since later
>>than its own Last-Modified, may presume the client has a later copy, 
>>and
>>discard its own copy.
>
>Uhm, so you're saying I can clean the entire cache with bogos IMS
>requests ?

that's not the point.

There could be any number of ways a cache could be depending on the 
current specification which requires that IMS came from a previous LM.

We're looking to change that between v20 and v21 just before last call.  
In a sub-part of the spec.

I think it's a non-trivial change, and deserves more discussion, and is 
possibly beyond the mandate for httpbis.


>
>That doesn't sound optimal or even sensible to me...
>
>--
>Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by 
>incompetence.
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 11:31:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 March 2013 11:31:49 GMT