W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: delta compression I-D 01

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:42:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbeAtaEoRCvwe-eEzFM2wadZSV7BQcBGViCwgSuBdVwS2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Give me about a week and it should be ready to go. I need to get the
huffman coding implemented stil and want to take another pass at optimizing
everything.


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> No huge changes logically except that the implementation actually uses
> canonical huffman codes, as spec'd.
> I'm interested in seeing your variation on it with the alternate encoding
> types!
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:36 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Excellent. The next step for me then is to update the java implementation
>> [1] based on this and get the new value encoding options tied in. I'll
>> review in detail later today but are there any major logic changes that
>> you've made in the process? It's been about two weeks since I last reviewed
>> your implementation.
>>
>> - James
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/jasnell/http2
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I posted an update to the delta header compression I-D yesterday (but
>>> failed to put the tags on it that automatically marked it for HTTPbis.
>>> *sigh*).
>>>
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rpeon-httpbis-header-compression/
>>>
>>> I'm sure I've missed things and gotten some wrong, but I'm moderately
>>> happy that it is mostly fleshed out.
>>>
>>> -=R
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 19:43:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 13 March 2013 19:43:31 GMT