W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: delta compression I-D 01

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcDELzyfTGteirfmwko0Avv25PrrZ9wJWu0Osq6SSwk-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
No huge changes logically except that the implementation actually uses
canonical huffman codes, as spec'd.
I'm interested in seeing your variation on it with the alternate encoding
types!


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:36 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Excellent. The next step for me then is to update the java implementation
> [1] based on this and get the new value encoding options tied in. I'll
> review in detail later today but are there any major logic changes that
> you've made in the process? It's been about two weeks since I last reviewed
> your implementation.
>
> - James
>
> [1] https://github.com/jasnell/http2
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I posted an update to the delta header compression I-D yesterday (but
>> failed to put the tags on it that automatically marked it for HTTPbis.
>> *sigh*).
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rpeon-httpbis-header-compression/
>>
>> I'm sure I've missed things and gotten some wrong, but I'm moderately
>> happy that it is mostly fleshed out.
>>
>> -=R
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 19:40:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 13 March 2013 19:40:12 GMT