W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name

From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:39:05 -0400
Message-Id: <BA4672C9-836D-4C21-AF5E-B26C457CAF05@la-grange.net>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>

Le 27 févr. 2013 à 17:11, Mark Nottingham a écrit :
> I'm OK if we choose to use "HTTP/2.0 Framing" and stick with it -- it's just that it's used inconsistently now. However, this may not be the best name, because it has "HTTP/2.0" in it, and then we go and talk about using HTTP/2.0 *on* it. OTOH I'm not thrilled about introducing Yet Another Acronym...

FWIW, +1 and not only for the discussions of this group, but for the future and people having to discuss different parts of the specifications when fixing/implementing libraries.

I would keep HTTP/2.0 for the semantics.
and something-else for the connection parts.

Karl Dubost
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 17:39:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:10 UTC