W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:19:54 +0100
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Message-ID: <20130307071954.GA18562@1wt.eu>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:15:30AM -0800, Roberto Peon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Martin Thomson
> <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > On 27 February 2013 10:51, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Then you can't do websockets, etc or whatever other protocol (maybe
> > video?,
> > > who knows) the web platform decides to do in the future on the same
> > > socket/session.
> >
> > Not true.  Write another RFC that says how you can share the
> > connection with websockets.  That might have to change some of the
> > rules, loosen some of the constraints, add some features.
> >
> 
> We have enough to do here without worrying about it, but there you go.
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUEFzz7NCls3Yms8hXxY4wGXJ3EEvoZc3GihrqPQcM0/edit

Did not see this one, it goes exactly in the direction I proposed for
having SPDY being the framing layer and HTTP the semantics layer :-)

Willy
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 07:20:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 March 2013 07:20:28 GMT