W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:07:57 +1100
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <46B6BA9A-E9ED-4BD1-8675-62FEA627B688@mnot.net>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>

On 19/02/2013, at 3:44 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Nico,
>> 
>> If I understand you, you're talking about making some really fundamental changes to the Web Architecture, which is squarely out of the WG's charter.
> 
> Is Phillip's proposal also out of charter?

If it requires significant modification of HTTP APIs to function, or changes to HTML, yes. 


>> I don't mind discussing ideas and understanding how we got here, so long as they don't distract from our work. I get the feeling that this is starting to happen.
>> 
>> Again, if you have a proposal, please write it up in detail and make it to the WG; endlessly discussing the minutia of a half-formed idea is not a productive use of anyone's time.
> 
> I... posted twice on this, within minutes.


Yes, but it's not about a simple post count. It's about continuing a thread where I'd already suggested making a more well-formed proposal before continuing discussion.

To be clear - we have a number of outstanding action items, and a considerable amount of work to do to get to a first implementation draft. So, I get very concerned when I see the list being distracted by things that aren't on the plan for that first implementation draft, and may never be in-scope for us.

So, from time to time I'll remind people to keep the discussion focused. This is not a slight against you - if I have a problem with your participation, I'll contact you privately first.

Thanks,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 05:08:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 February 2013 05:08:26 GMT