Hey Guys, What do you think of the request compression and response multiplexing scheme advocated by HTTP-MPLEX? Rob Sent on a mobile device, typos expected. On 18/02/2013, at 10:07 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > An mget that leverages server push in http/2 and individual cacheable response streams would be very interesting and could address at least some of the prioritization issues. > > On Feb 17, 2013 12:17 PM, "Helge Heß" <helge.hess@opengroupware.org> wrote: >> On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote: >> > We added a multiget REPORT to CalDAV (RFC4791) and CardDAV (RFC6352) which is used by clients when sync'ing a lot of resources (e.g., initial account setup). The one major criticism has been lack of cacheability of the individual resources included in the multiget. >> >> The other major criticisms being: >> a) content needs to be XML encoded >> b) only allows for GETs, not for other operations >> >> I'd also like to see a generic, HTTP-level BATCH request. Please lets not do 'just' an MGET. >> >> hh
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 00:48:02 UTC