- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:08:45 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
"Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > > Regarding proactive negotiation in HTTP/2, I'll note that Waka > strips all negotiation fields. I find the entire feature revolting, > from every architectural perspective, and would take the opportunity > of 2.x to remove it entirely. > That's a bold statement! I'm surprised at the source -- I was under the impression that the late binding of representation to resource was a key feature of REST, and would therefore also be part of Waka? This isn't the place for such a discussion, but I was hoping you'd enlighten us as to your thinking, either on your blog or here: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rest-discuss/message/19269 What is on-topic here, is whether eliminating conneg in HTTP 2 amounts to a fundamental change to Web architecture, which exceeds the WG charter? -Eric
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:09:24 UTC