W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:50:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdScMDij_dnRgBm7=h8gktiGoW7FcoBpO+qxj3cu7EbCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
[snip]
>
> The Frame format:
>
>         0                   1
>         0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
>        +-+-+-----------+---------------+
>        |F|C|  type     |               |
>        +-+-+-----------+               +
>        |        Frame Length (24)      |
>        +-------------------------------+
>        |       opaque ID (16)          |
>        +-------------------------------+
>        |     Frame Data (16...N)       |
>        +-------------------------------+
>

+1 ... I'm still unconvinced that control frames ought to be any
longer than 16-bit but this seems like a reasonable compromise and
workable format.

- James
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:51:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:51:44 GMT