W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:05:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdoiOAu_Fc57s=duQQAOWuM7BW-uHEppDi56T5Oty75VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It strikes me that the 72X error codes really suit this conversation well :)
-=R


On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> --------
> In message <51127A56.4080602@zinks.de>, Roland Zink writes:
> >On 06.02.2013 16:24, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> And just how big do you forsee an controlframe being able to get ?
> >If you want to attack a server this can be any size. For example I have
> >seen a 90k URL.
>
> And being given the length up front, what is the problem for the
> server in detecting the DoS and handling it appropriately ?
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:06:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:06:26 GMT