W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:24:28 +0000
To: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <54235.1360164268@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In message <CAAbTgTtC1sZD5fasfB_pLTZz=0_C09Kv44hFvRaQXDs+NMQRSA@mail.gmail.com>
, Brian Pane writes:

>The "chop it up to more manageable bits" approach works for data
>frames, where a load balancer receiving a large frame can chop it up,
>thereby maintaining a limit on per-connection memory usage.  But it
>doesn't work for control frames;

And just how big do you forsee an controlframe being able to get ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 15:24:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:10 UTC