- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:24:28 +0000
- To: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
- cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -------- In message <CAAbTgTtC1sZD5fasfB_pLTZz=0_C09Kv44hFvRaQXDs+NMQRSA@mail.gmail.com> , Brian Pane writes: >The "chop it up to more manageable bits" approach works for data >frames, where a load balancer receiving a large frame can chop it up, >thereby maintaining a limit on per-connection memory usage. But it >doesn't work for control frames; And just how big do you forsee an controlframe being able to get ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 15:24:51 UTC