W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Outstanding Action Items

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:29:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdV_ROyt-jy0dcwcCgjWrbRedLLV4pADj9TbdC1ytk_Ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Roberto: make detailed proposal for frame size w/ continuation bit:
mailed out.


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Add a way to control the size of the state kept.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 06/02/2013, at 8:29 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You also had a request of me to add a flag to the delta stuff to
> optionally do or not do... (I forget)
> > -=R
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > I see (or, sometimes, infer) the following action items in the minutes:
> >
> > * Mark: re-ping the TLS WG for NPN status
> > * Eliot: write text for a registry of opaque strings to identify
> different things to negotiate for
> > * Martin: explain use case for weights in the DNS record
> > * Eliot: revise his RR proposal based upon discussion
> > * Roberto: revise draft and ship new example code for delta
> > * Herve: publish draft and ship example code for headerdiff
> > * Roberto / Will / Hasan: assure that SPDY4 changes are raised as issues
> for WG to consider, or given to editors if purely editorial
> > * Mark: raise a new issue for handing Expect/100-continue
> > * Mark: raise a new issue for negotiation of trailers
> > * Mark: raise a new issue for indicating the end of a header block
> > * Mark: raise a new issue about assuring that routing data (e.g., :host,
> :path, :scheme) appears before headers
> > * Roberto: make detailed proposal for frame size w/ continuation bit
> > * Will: make a detailed proposal for sesion-level flow control. Initial
> values to be 64k.
> > * Eliot: amend his record to accommodate "initial options"
> > * Roberto: forward complete proposal from spdy4 for grouping and
> re-prioritisation
> > * Hasan: write a proposal for pushpromise; moving associated-to from
> synstream to it.
> > * Will: double check that spdy's change to directionality for max
> streams has made it into http/2, or raise issue.
> > * Editors: flesh out security considerations for server push, or note in
> new issue
> > * Mike B: make proposal on list for security/privacy considerations of
> settings.
> > * Eliot + Martin: Start discussion of magic on list.  DONE
> > * Hasan: Send proposal about metrics to gather during testing to list.
> > * Mark: Continue discussion of testing / data gathering on list.
> >
> > Please reply here when you've completed one. And, if I've missed one,
> please yell.
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 22:29:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2013 22:29:34 GMT