W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:34:39 +0000
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
cc: William Chan (ι™ˆζ™Ίζ˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2346.1360010079@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In message <42A54D15-0AA3-4172-94F7-E94C86E84D7F@niven-jenkins.co.uk>, Ben Nive
n-Jenkins writes:

>So the idea is the protocol contains enough 'hooks' to sufficiently 
>express the different priorities between & within groups that folks 
>would like to express but isn't prescriptive about how anyone uses or 
>implements different prioritisation, scheduling, etc schemes.

That was clearly not how the original poster presented it:

	"I consider all those options as suboptimal, and thus
	consider this issue to be a protocol bug. Our SPDY/4
	prioritization proposal addresses this by [...]"

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 20:35:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC