W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:32:01 +1300
Message-Id: <1F7487DF-D460-444D-A7C2-2FF4AE620EE3@qbik.com>
Cc: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Not really. 

Just reserve a number to indicate the method name is following in text

Or reserve a range for private use

Could even largely avoid sending method at all.  If it were treated like a field, default to GET you would only need to send if it changed


Sent from my iPad

On 2/02/2013, at 9:28, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2013-02-01 21:17, Adrien de Croy wrote:
>> We see ftp:// all the time
>> 
>> As for using a character or 2 for the method. Why? What is wrong with numbers?
>> 
>> 1 = GET
>> 2 = HEAD
>> 3 = POST
>> etc.
>> ...
> 
> Experimenting with new method names becomes really really hard.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 20:32:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 February 2013 20:32:29 GMT