W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good

From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:10:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNr1p_8nxC5_dr3zEOTpPH1C=O6f+=G1fP5TQOnFHYLj+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Pablo <paa.listas@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:42 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:y
> limited, power.
>
> Fair enough. I mostly wanted to chime in to provide the "other"
> opinion here, since you stated that the previous reaction had been
> pretty positive. Please take my comments as a contrary opinion for
> people to consider before we draw any conclusions here.
>
> >
>

I agree with Will here - if we end up with a stateful mechanism (which we
seem to be headed towards; reasonably so) then let's have just that
mechanism.
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 15:11:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 January 2013 15:11:25 GMT