W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 04:52:03 -0800
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F4C2A095-50C7-451B-9AFF-A200592CCB4D@gbiv.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On Jan 19, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Julian et al,
> I think the important bit here is the context that we're talking about the semantics of an expressed preference -- which can be freely ignored, or selectively applied, without affecting conformance. The important thing is that the preference itself have clear semantics, which I think Roy's change does (especially in concert with changes elsewhere).
> As such, I think the relevant question is whether this is specific to A-L, or all A-* that take qvalues. Roy, thoughts?

I am pretty sure it is specific to languages.  Accept has never been
treated as an ordered list, Accept-Encoding was originally designed
to prefer the smallest representation (changing that to qvalues was
unfortunate), and Accept-Charset is almost deprecated at this point.

Received on Sunday, 20 January 2013 12:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC