W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding

From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:28:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOgYgemMX9FHrTWnv=+oWaVjtj7R9qyToznb0Y2yjKnCGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 6:11 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, indeed. I'm wondering if there's a reasonable balance we can support
> here... That is, provide for backwards compatibility for most but not all
> 1.1 features and optimize for the most commonly used bits. Restricting set
> cookie syntax could be one of those compromises.

We should try to optimize bridging between HTTP/1.* and HTTP/2.0, but
we should not penalize a pure HTTP/2.0 future in the process.  The
obvious thing to do is to provide an escape hatch for contents we
don't optimize and not try to optimize absolutely everything.

Received on Sunday, 20 January 2013 01:28:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC