I'm not convinced it is critical really. I included that basically in case others think lossless bidirectional transformation between 1.1 and 2.0 it's essential. On Jan 18, 2013 10:04 AM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 January 2013 09:49, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > > When translating an optimized Http/2 Set-Cookie to Http/1, if the Binary > > Value Bit is set, the val is Base64 encoded and a new "Binary" flag is > added > > to the Http/1 Set-Cookie. > > This, I have no problem with, it merely indicates that the header > originated in HTTP/2.0. What I have a problem with is this: > > > Cookie: key*={base64} > > Having the name change is surprising. Why is it so critical for an > HTTP/1.1 encoded value to be encoded in the binary form in HTTP/2.0? >Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 18:34:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 January 2013 18:34:33 GMT